tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1485018291329102174.post6319689474834222233..comments2022-04-03T00:59:46.103-07:00Comments on Beyond Calvinism: Answering Calvinist Proof-Texts, Part 1 - John 6Andrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03881837360049891428noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1485018291329102174.post-63425215896739740342015-04-06T07:41:05.271-07:002015-04-06T07:41:05.271-07:00Thanks for sharing these links!Thanks for sharing these links!Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03881837360049891428noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1485018291329102174.post-61666163638974947382015-04-03T06:43:51.766-07:002015-04-03T06:43:51.766-07:00With regards to the difference between to the two ...With regards to the difference between to the two uses of "come" in John 6, you might like Steve Witzki's article: http://www.fwponline.cc/v23n1/johnsixPt1_witzki.html<br /><br />Also, just a quick note that David Allen referenced John 12:34 when it should be John 12:32. <br /><br />For another view of John 6 and related passages in John, see here: https://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/various-thoughts-on-the-calvinist-use-of-john-6-and-related-passages-from-johns-gospel-to-support-calvinism/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com